فهرست منبع

Fixes for whatsnew. Thanks to maznaz!

Ask Solem 11 سال پیش
والد
کامیت
7ca23fbebc
1فایلهای تغییر یافته به همراه13 افزوده شده و 13 حذف شده
  1. 13 13
      docs/whatsnew-3.1.rst

+ 13 - 13
docs/whatsnew-3.1.rst

@@ -30,18 +30,18 @@ it's important that you read the following section.
 This version is officially supported on CPython 2.6, 2.7 and 3.3,
 This version is officially supported on CPython 2.6, 2.7 and 3.3,
 and also supported on PyPy.
 and also supported on PyPy.
 
 
-Highlights
-==========
+Table of Contents
+=================
 
 
-.. topic:: Overview
+.. topic:: Highlights
 
 
-    - Massive prefork pool improvements
+    - Massive prefork pool improvements.
 
 
     - Now supports Django out of the box.
     - Now supports Django out of the box.
 
 
         See the new tutorial at :ref:`django-first-steps`.
         See the new tutorial at :ref:`django-first-steps`.
 
 
-    - Extend the worker using bootsteps
+    - Extend the worker using bootsteps.
 
 
     - Gossip and Mingle: Worker to worker communication.
     - Gossip and Mingle: Worker to worker communication.
 
 
@@ -59,8 +59,8 @@ Highlights
 Important Notes
 Important Notes
 ===============
 ===============
 
 
-Drops support for Python 2.5
-----------------------------
+Dropped support for Python 2.5
+------------------------------
 
 
 Celery now requires Python 2.6 or later.
 Celery now requires Python 2.6 or later.
 
 
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ The Django community has a convention where there's a separate
 django-x package for every library, acting like a bridge between
 django-x package for every library, acting like a bridge between
 Django and the library.
 Django and the library.
 
 
-Having a separate project for Django users have been a pain for Celery,
+Having a separate project for Django users has been a pain for Celery,
 with multiple issue trackers and multiple documentation
 with multiple issue trackers and multiple documentation
 sources, and then lastly since 3.0 we even had different APIs.
 sources, and then lastly since 3.0 we even had different APIs.
 
 
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ use the same library, the same API and the same documentation as
 everyone else.
 everyone else.
 
 
 There is no rush to port your existing code to use the new API,
 There is no rush to port your existing code to use the new API,
-but if you would like to experiment with it you should now that:
+but if you would like to experiment with it you should know that:
 
 
 - You need to use a Celery application instance.
 - You need to use a Celery application instance.
 
 
@@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ To get started with the new API you should first read the :ref:`first-steps`
 tutorial, and then you should read the Django specific instructions in
 tutorial, and then you should read the Django specific instructions in
 :ref:`django-first-steps`.
 :ref:`django-first-steps`.
 
 
-The fixes and improvements applied by the django-celery library is now
+The fixes and improvements applied by the django-celery library are now
 automatically applied by core Celery when it detects that
 automatically applied by core Celery when it detects that
 the :envvar:`DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE` environment variable is set.
 the :envvar:`DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE` environment variable is set.
 
 
@@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ The available substitutions are as follows:
 Bound tasks
 Bound tasks
 -----------
 -----------
 
 
-The task decorator can now created "bound tasks", which means that the
+The task decorator can now create "bound tasks", which means that the
 task will receive the ``self`` argument.
 task will receive the ``self`` argument.
 
 
 .. code-block:: python
 .. code-block:: python
@@ -449,8 +449,8 @@ See the :ref:`guide-extending` guide for more information.
     to use it then please contact the mailing-list and we will help you port
     to use it then please contact the mailing-list and we will help you port
     the bootstep to the new API.
     the bootstep to the new API.
 
 
-New result backend with RPC semantics
--------------------------------------
+New RPC result backend
+----------------------
 
 
 This new experimental version of the ``amqp`` result backend is a very good
 This new experimental version of the ``amqp`` result backend is a very good
 alternative to use in classical RPC scenarios, where the process that initiates
 alternative to use in classical RPC scenarios, where the process that initiates