|
@@ -53,16 +53,16 @@ Misconceptions
|
|
|
Does Celery really consist of 50.000 lines of code?
|
|
|
---------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
-**Answer:**: No, this and similarly large number have
|
|
|
-been reported in various locations.
|
|
|
+**Answer:** No, this and similarly large numbers have
|
|
|
+been reported at various locations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-This a list of the actual numbers:
|
|
|
+The numbers as of this writing are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
- core: 7,141 lines of code.
|
|
|
- tests: 14,209 lines.
|
|
|
- backends, contrib, compat utilities: 9,032 lines.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-Lines of code is not a useful metric to prove anything, so
|
|
|
+Lines of code is not a useful metric, so
|
|
|
even if Celery did consist of 50k lines of code you would not
|
|
|
be able to draw any conclusions from such a number.
|
|
|
|
|
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ JSON implementation.
|
|
|
see :ref:`bundles`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-.. _faq-heavyweight
|
|
|
+.. _faq-heavyweight:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is Celery heavy-weight?
|
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
@@ -158,8 +158,8 @@ Is Celery heavy-weight?
|
|
|
Celery poses very little overhead both in memory footprint and
|
|
|
performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-But not that the default configuration is not optimized for either,
|
|
|
-see the :ref:`guide-optimizing` guide for more information.
|
|
|
+But please note that the default configuration is not optimized for time nor
|
|
|
+space, see the :ref:`guide-optimizing` guide for more information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _faq-serializion-is-a-choice:
|
|
|
|